King, said Meese, would have opposed affirmative action as a violation of his ideal “colorblind” society. In 1981, in a speech before the California Peace Officers Assn., he called the American Civil Liberties Union a “criminals’ lobby.” At Christmas time in 1983, he said he had seen no “authoritative” evidence of a serious hunger problem in America, and that some people go to soup kitchens “because the food is free, and that’s easier than paying for it.” This year, five days before Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday was first celebrated as a federal holiday, Meese invoked the slain civil-rights leader’s name in attacking affirmative action. Nevertheless, statement by statement, controversy by controversy, Edwin Meese III began to emerge in the public perception-even before he became attorney general in 1985 after a rancorous year of debate over his nomination-as a one-man scourge of traditional liberal thinking and as the Administration’s ideological point man. Baker III, the daily nuts-and-bolts man, or Deputy Chief of Staff Michael K. Of the troika of advisers who served the President during his first term, Meese was the most outspoken on issues but nonetheless was rather colorless-certainly no media attraction compared to Chief of Staff James A. Meese was late to controversy, and even the revelations about his personal financial dealings that emerged from his confirmation hearings as attorney general smacked less of outright wrongdoing than did the accusations against a host of lesser appointees who by the second Reagan term had been driven from office. Kirkpatrick easily overshadowed the longtime Reagan factotum as Administration standard-bearers for the New Right. ![]() Watt and United Nations Ambassador Jeane J. WHAT DOES TRUMP WANT?Ĭipollone said the House has “not established any procedures affording the President even the most basic protections demanded by due process under the Constitution and by fundamental fairness” in violation of “every past precedent.It was easy to overlook Ed Meese at the start of Ronald Reagan’s first term in the White House. The following explains Trump’s positions and the procedures followed in the past, and examines whether the current inquiry does indeed violate Trump’s constitutional rights. Allowing Trump’s lawyers to participate anyway could build public support and make it appear more fair, however, they said. Legal experts say because impeachment is a political, and not legal, process, the House has broad authority to set the ground rules for an inquiry. In a letter to top House Democrats, White House Counsel Pat Cipollone said Trump’s lawyers must be allowed to call and cross-examine witnesses, access evidence, and be afforded other “basic rights guaranteed to all Americans.” ![]() ![]() President Donald Trump speaks as he awards the Presidential Medal of Freedom to former Attorney General Edwin Meese in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, October 8, 2019. President Andrew Jackson hanging in the background, U.S. FILE PHOTO: With a portrait of former U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |